15 June 2007

Behind the Numbers Part 2

By Galia BarHava-Monteith

The gender pay gap

Have you been lying awake at night wondering if men are still better paid than women for the same jobs? Well, probably not, but we are all too aware that the pay gap is still with us. However, the figures that are usually quoted are very broad, such as median income for all men ages 25-45.

I was interested in specifically comparing the income of the same professional groups I looked at in Part 1 of this series. I was also interested to see if the highest paid men were part of these occupational groups.

Background

There were almost 237,000 men in New Zealand in 2001 who were classified as full time 'Professionals' or 'Legislators, Administrators and Managers' compared with 219,000 women in the same categories. These men represented just over a quarter of all men and women surveyed in the census

Who's better educated?

Women are! Just under half of the men in these groups (47%) held an advanced vocational qualification, a bachelor degree or higher qualification. This compares to over half (57%) of the women.

Who earns more than $100K?

The proportion of full time working adults who earned over $100K in 2001 was 4%. The proportion of 'Professionals' and 'Legislators, Administrators and Managers' (both men and women) who earned over $100k in 2001 was 10%.

The interesting picture emerged when I looked at women and men in these two groups separately. Fourteen percent (14%) of men who were 'Professionals' and 'Legislators, Administrators and Managers' earned over $100K in 2001.

Only 3%, yes, THREE PERCENT of the women in the same two categories who were working full time earned over $100K!!

So who are the men that earn the most and how do they compare to the women who earned the most?

To re-cap, the highest paid women in 2001 were Information Technology Managers with a median income of $61,158. Who do you think were the highest paid men from our selection of occupations in 2001?

You probably guessed it, barristers and solicitors. Male barristers and solicitors had a median income of $90,704 in 2001. This median income is almost twice as much as women barristers and solicitors whose median income was $48,567 in 2001.

And here is how the median incomes for our select occupations compares for men and women and the income gap between them:

Occupation
Median income for women
Median income for men
Pay Gap
Information Technology Managers
$61,158
$75,276
$14,118
Human Resources manager
$54,765
$62,642
$7,877
Advertising and Public Relations Manager
$51,608
$72,608
$21,000
Barristers and Solicitors
$48,567
$90,704
$42,137
Management Consultant
$47,748
$66,406
$18,658
Chief Executive and Managing Director
$47,517
$74,936
$27,419
Accountant
$41,062
$59,919
$18,857

NOTE - these detailed median income figures are for 'the employed' which implies all employed not just full time. More on this later.

It's just too depressing. Women had a significantly lower median income for each of the occupations examined. It even applied in HR (although this was the smallest gap), but the discrepancy for barristers is by far the largest.

I must be a masochist because I kept going. I looked at the proportion of men and women in these occupations who earned over $100K in 2001.

So here we go:

Occupation
% Women earning over $100K
% Men earning over $100K
Information Technology Managers
13%
25%
Human Resources Manager
10%
18%
Advertising and Public Relations Manager
9%
27%
Barristers and Solicitors
13%
44%
Management Consultant
16%
30%
Chief Executive and Managing Director
19%
38%
Accountant
3%
20%

Men in 2001 were much better paid than women and were basically at least twice (with the exception of HR) as likely as women to earn over $100K.

However, these detailed median income figures are for all employed adults, not just for the full time employed. Maybe these figures reflect the fact that women in these occupations are more likely to work part time?

In my next and final article on the 2001 figures I'll try and answer this question.

What are your thoughts about these numbers? Were you surprised? Do you think 2006 Census numbers will reflect a similar reality? We would love to hear from you, so please e-mail us on feedback@professionelle.co.nz

 

© Professionelle Ltd 2007

Comments (0)

Add your comment

Add your comment

  • This is not shown on the site, but required for emailing follow up comments to you.